← All topics

Anger & Provocation

Seneca wrote three books against anger, and the case he makes is absolute: it is not a passion to be moderated but one to be refused outright. Anger, in the Stoic analysis, is a judgement - that you have been wronged, and that something must be done about it - and like any judgement it can be examined before you act on it. Marcus works the same ground from the other direction, mostly by rehearsing reasons not to be surprised by other people. They act badly out of ignorance of what is good. You will meet such people today. You are sometimes one of them.

50 passages

"I shall omit the other varieties of anger, which the Greeks distinguish by various names, because we have no distinctive words for them in our language, although we call men bitter and harsh, and also peevish, frantic, clamorous, surly and fierce: all of which are different forms of irascibility."

— Seneca, On Anger 1.04

"What will anger profit you?"

— Marcus Aurelius, The Meditations 5.28

"We have now succeeded, my Novatus, in properly regulating our own minds: they either do not feel anger or are above it: let us next see how we may soothe the wrath of others, for we do not only wish to be whole, but to heal."

— Seneca, On Anger 3.39

"Here one of the white horses which drew the royal chariot was washed away, and his loss moved the king to such violent rage, that he swore to reduce the river which had carried off his royal retinue to so low an ebb that even women should walk across it and trample upon it."

— Seneca, On Anger 3.21

"Now we ought to fight against the first causes of evil: the cause of anger is the belief that we are injured; this belief, therefore, should not be lightly entertained."

— Seneca, On Anger 2.22

"Let the wise man be moderate, and when things have to be done somewhat briskly, let him call force, not anger, to his aid."

— Seneca, On Anger 2.17

"To rejoice and be glad is the proper and natural function of virtue: it is as much beneath her dignity to be angry, as to mourn: now, sorrow is the companion of anger, and all anger ends in sorrow, either from remorse or from failure."

— Seneca, On Anger 2.06

"So deplorable is the weakness of men's minds when reason no longer guides them."

— Seneca, On the Firmness of a Wise Man 1.17

"But it is not expedient that anger should be increased: therefore it is not expedient that it should exist at all, for that which grows bad by increase cannot be a good thing."

— Seneca, On Anger 1.13

"When you run against some one's wrong behaviour, go on at once to reflect what similar wrong act of your own there is; for instance, to esteem money or pleasure or glory as goods, and so on with each kind."

— Marcus Aurelius, The Meditations 10.30

In summary

The interesting disagreement here is with Aristotle, who held that the right amount of anger at the right time is part of a good character. Seneca argues that this concedes too much: anger cannot be kept on a leash, since it is fast, self-justifying, and does not consult you about proportion once it is loose. What the Stoics offer in its place is not passivity. You can still correct someone, punish a wrong, or oppose a cruelty - just without the internal state that makes you worse at all three.